美國(guó)能源部準(zhǔn)備此EA來(lái)評(píng)估與2009年《美國(guó)復(fù)蘇與再投資法案》（《復(fù)蘇法案》；《公法》 111-5、123條第115款）根據(jù)與太平洋天然氣和電力公司達(dá)成的合作協(xié)議提供財(cái)政援助贈(zèng)款的潛在環(huán)境后果。 （PG＆E）作為智能電網(wǎng)演示計(jì)劃的一部分。該項(xiàng)目由聯(lián)邦能源部，加利福尼亞公共事業(yè)委員會(huì)和加利福尼亞能源委員會(huì)共同資助。如果PG＆E收到資金，公司將提議建造，運(yùn)營(yíng)和關(guān)閉注入和撤出井以及相關(guān)的臨時(shí)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)設(shè)施，以對(duì)貧乏的氣田進(jìn)行壓縮測(cè)試。要測(cè)試的地質(zhì)構(gòu)造位于加利福尼亞州圣華金縣的金島。該項(xiàng)目將包括對(duì)CAES儲(chǔ)層進(jìn)行壓力測(cè)試，以進(jìn)一步檢查和確認(rèn)該場(chǎng)地的地質(zhì)適宜性，并提供更詳細(xì)的信息，為工程設(shè)計(jì)將該場(chǎng)地作為CAES設(shè)施的未來(lái)用途提供基礎(chǔ)。許可程序包括美國(guó)能源部（DOE）作為主要聯(lián)邦機(jī)構(gòu)，以遵守經(jīng)修訂的1969年《國(guó)家環(huán)境政策法》（NEPA）和美國(guó)環(huán)境保護(hù)局的地下注入控制計(jì)劃V級(jí)注入和撤離井。該EA分析了美國(guó)能源部提議的行動(dòng)的潛在環(huán)境影響，該行動(dòng)為PGE＆CAES壓縮測(cè)試項(xiàng)目和“無(wú)行動(dòng)替代方案”提供了《恢復(fù)法案》資金。該項(xiàng)目的壓縮測(cè)試部分的總成本約為20至2500萬(wàn)美元。美國(guó)能源部在該EA中評(píng)估了對(duì)空氣質(zhì)量的影響；土地資源/土地利用；生物資源；地質(zhì)和土壤；噪音和振動(dòng)；文化，歷史和古生物學(xué)資源；社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和環(huán)境正義；公共和職業(yè)健康與安全；廢物管理；美學(xué)和視覺(jué)資源；公用事業(yè)，能源和礦產(chǎn)；運(yùn)輸; PG＆E擬議項(xiàng)目中的水資源。
DOE prepared this EA to evaluate the potential environmental consequences of providing a financial assistance grant under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act; Public Law 111-5, 123 Stat.115) in a cooperative agreement with Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) as part of the Smart Grid Demonstrations Program. The project is co-funded by the federal DOE, California Public Utilities Commission, and the California Energy Commission. If PG&E receives the funding, the company proposes construction, operation, and closure of an injection and withdrawal well and associated temporary site facilities required to conduct compression testing of a depleted gas field. The geological formation to be tested is located on King Island, San Joaquin County, California. The project would consist of pressure testing a CAES reservoir to further examine and confirm the geological suitability of the site and provide more detailed information to provide a basis for engineering a possible future use of this site as a CAES facility. The permitting process includes the DOE serving as the lead federal agency for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for an Underground Injection Control Program Class V Injection & Withdrawal Well. This EA analyzes the potential environmental impacts of DOE’s proposed action of providing Recovery Act funding for the PGE& CAES compression-testing project and of the No-Action Alternative. The total cost of the compression-testing component of the project would be approximately $20 to $25 million.In this EA, DOE evaluated the impacts to air quality; land resources/land use; biological resources; geology and soils; noise & vibration; cultural, historical and paleontological resources; socioeconomics and environmental justice; public and occupational health and safety; waste management; aesthetics and visual resources; utilities, energy and minerals; transportation; and water resources from PG&E’s proposed Project.
-
加拿大煤炭開(kāi)采Coal Mining in Canada 2021-09-24
-
年終總結(jié)新年計(jì)劃工作匯報(bào)PPT模板 2021-09-24