首頁(yè) > 資料下載 > 碳捕獲新型燃煤電廠的成本與美國(guó)公共政策封存2008Cost and U.S. public policy for new coal power plants with carbon capture

碳捕獲新型燃煤電廠的成本與美國(guó)公共政策封存2008Cost and U.S. public policy for new coal power plants with carbon capture

資料類(lèi)別：
資料大小：
資料編號(hào)：
資料狀態(tài)：
更新時(shí)間：2021-09-09
下載次數(shù)：次

資料簡(jiǎn)介

本文提供了一個(gè)新的超臨界煤粉（SCPC）植物與CCS的財(cái)務(wù)分析比較兩個(gè)相關(guān)氣候政策的影響。首先，提出了一種新的超臨界煤粉廠的成本估算方法，既有CCS又有CCS。這一估計(jì)與公共來(lái)源的成本估算進(jìn)行了比較。第二，幾個(gè)電流和討論了與CCS相關(guān)的公共政策。最后，進(jìn)行財(cái)務(wù)分析，評(píng)價(jià)其有效性。兩種可能的美國(guó)碳法規(guī)對(duì)部署NTH植物CCS技術(shù)。得出的結(jié)論是，美國(guó)領(lǐng)先的碳上限和貿(mào)易票據(jù)可能不足以以與全球二氧化碳減排一致的方式部署CCS技術(shù)。情節(jié)。更嚴(yán)格的碳管制和更具挑戰(zhàn)性的研發(fā)和示范項(xiàng)目降低CCS成本還必須考慮。

This paper provides a financial analysis for new supercritical pulverized coal (SCPC) plants with CCS that compares the effects of two relevant climate policies. First, an updated cost estimate is presented for new supercritical pulverized coal plants, both with and without CCS. This estimate is compared with costs estimates from public sources. Second, several current and proposed public policies relevant to CCS are discussed. Finally, a financial analysis is performed to evaluate the effectiveness of two likely US carbon regulations on deploying Nth-plant CCS technology. The conclusion is that the leading US carbon cap-and- trade bills will likely not be sufficient to deploy CCS technology in a manner consistent with global CO2 emissions reduction scenarios. A more strict carbon regulation and a more aggressive R&D and demonstration program for reducing the cost of CCS must also be considered.

資料截圖

上一條：DOE/NETL對(duì)現(xiàn)有燃煤電廠的碳捕獲研究與開(kāi)發(fā)計(jì)劃DOE/NETL’s Carbon Capture R&D Program for Existing Coal-Fired

下一條：隨著生產(chǎn)和使用模式的轉(zhuǎn)變，煤灰回收率達(dá)到創(chuàng)紀(jì)錄的56%。Coal Ash Recycling Reaches Record 56 Percent Amid Shifting Production an

版權(quán)：如無(wú)特殊注明，文章轉(zhuǎn)載自網(wǎng)絡(luò)，侵權(quán)請(qǐng)聯(lián)系cnmhg168#163.com刪除！文件均為網(wǎng)友上傳，僅供研究和學(xué)習(xí)使用，務(wù)必24小時(shí)內(nèi)刪除。